Sunday, November 16, 2014

And sometimes a class assignment and a subject you love unite. The following is my most recent "Concept Sermon" (abbreviated/mini sermon) for my upper level Wisdom Traditions preaching class:
            I don’t think I’ve ever heard a sermon preached on Song of Songs in my twenty two-ish years of life in the church. This is probably due to many Christians (including pastors) not always knowing quite what to do with the text. God is never specifically mentioned within the eight chapters of the book, and the scripture initially seems to be filled only with sexual innuendos leaving readers to wonder how it ever came to be one of the wisdom literature books in the bible in the first place. However, if one is to read the text through a feminist lens, there is much to be gleaned beyond the surface level. For instance, Song of Songs provides us with perspectives about the power of women and the importance of egalitarian relationships.
            We do not have to look very far within the culture in which we work, live, play, and learn today in order to find sure signs that women are generally considered man’s less-than-equal counterpart.  Women do not get paid as much as men do in various jobs. Women are not always chosen for certain jobs due to their gender. Women who are single mothers are considered irresponsible human beings while single fathers tend to steal the show (“What a great guy!” you’ll often hear people say.). When women stay with significant others who abuse them in various ways, more attention is focused on how “weak” the woman is rather than taking a minute to try to understand her side of the story. I do not say these things to discount mankind as a whole in our world, but I do wish to point out that there are inarguable biases in our society toward men and that we all need to be more active in our efforts toward standing in solidarity with women for equality. And believe it or not, Song of Solomon provides its readers with tools that encourage such equality.
            Throughout the book, the Shulammite woman continuously does what she has to do in order to be with the man she loves despite all who are against her. She thrives despite the chastisement from the Jerusalem daughters about her love for the man and does not let the guards of the city abusing her keep her from pressing on to find and be with her love. (Now, that is a powerful woman!) Multiple times throughout the text it is made clear that the male voice in the dialogical poetry that comprises Song of Songs is absolutely captivated by the unnamed Shulammite woman whom he loves. They are (as far as the reader and many commentators can tell) in a relationship based on equality.
 In an article she wrote about Song of Songs from a feminist and womanist perspective, Robin McCall says, “The Shulammite has power over him, her lover acknowledges, not because of anything she has done, but simply because she is herself— beautiful, desirable, and precious to him.”[1] I wonder what would happen if we were more diligent in telling little girls from the earliest stages of their adolescence that they have power and that they are enough just by being themselves and that they need not worry about fitting into the norms deemed appropriate by culture and society. What if we told little girls God created them for more than who society tells them they need to be?
            A recent top-of-the-chart country hit feeds the exact opposite of the previously mentioned idea. Rising country star, RaeLynn, has explained that her song, “God Made Girls,” is a tune of empowerment for young women. Instead, however, the song seems to condone keeping in place the stereotypes, constraints, and bold lines to which women are expected to adhere. RaeLynn’s idea of empowering women and the ways in which McCall beckons us to notice the women empowerment in Song of Songs seem like two very different concepts. Some of the “God Made Girls” lyrics read, “Somebody's gotta wear a pretty skirt/Somebody's gotta be the one to flirt/Somebody’s gotta wanna hold his hand, so God made girls.” While it is acceptable for girls to grow up into young ladies and women who like to do these things, I am incredibly confident in saying that God did not create women specifically for these and other like-minded purposes.
We need to give the women in our world a better representation of God’s love for them and make clear that they are strong, powerful, and that they deserve nothing less than the best—in their work, in their families, and in their romantic relationships. And we, as the larger society, do not get to call those shots! We must meet women where they are, empower them by standing in solidarity with them, and remind them that they were created and are loved by the One who loves them for nothing that they did, but simply because they are themselves.



[1] Robin C. McCall, “‘Most Beautiful Among Women’: Feminist/Womanist Contributions to Reading the Song of Songs,” Review & Expositor 105 (August 2008): 430.

1 comment: